4.3 Article

Effectiveness and Tolerability of High-Dose (23 mg/d) Versus Standard-Dose (10 mg/d) Donepezil in Moderate to Severe Alzheimer's Disease: A 24-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind Study

期刊

CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 1234-1251

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.06.019

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; cognitive disorders; dementia; randomized controlled clinical trials

资金

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  2. Danone
  3. Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  4. Eli Lilly and Company
  5. Forest Laboratories, Inc.
  6. Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc.
  7. Medivation, Inc.
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  9. OctaPharma AG
  10. Pfizer Inc
  11. Sonexa Therapeutics, Inc.
  12. US Public Health Service [NIA P30-AG10133, U01 AG 024904, U24 AG026385, AG18379]
  13. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  14. Eisai
  15. Elan
  16. Janssen Alzheimer's Immunotherapy
  17. Pfizer
  18. Wyeth
  19. Cephalon, Inc
  20. Forest
  21. GlaxoSmithKline
  22. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
  23. Neurochem Inc.,
  24. Voyager Pharmaceutical Corporation
  25. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
  26. Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network [NIA 1U01AG032438-01]
  27. Aging Brain: DTI, Subcortical Ischemia, and Behavior [NIA 1 R03 AG023916-01A1]
  28. Norman and Rosalie Fain Family Foundation
  29. Champlin Foundation
  30. Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  31. AC Immune SA
  32. Allergan Inc.
  33. Epix Pharmaceuticals, Inc
  34. Genentech, Inc.
  35. MedAvante, Inc.
  36. Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp.
  37. Myriad
  38. sanofi-aventis
  39. Schering-Plough
  40. Worldwide Clinical Trials, Inc.
  41. Abbott Laboratories Inc.
  42. AstraZeneca
  43. Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc.
  44. Baxter Healthcare Corporation
  45. Medivation
  46. Merck
  47. Toyama
  48. Alzheimer's Foundation of America
  49. National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Mental Health
  50. Alzheimer's Association
  51. Arizona Department of Health Services
  52. Institute for Mental Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Currently approved Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatments have been reported to provide symptomatic benefit, without proven impact on clinical progression. We hypothesized that the loss of initial therapeutic benefit over time may be mitigated by higher doses of a cholinesterase inhibitor. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and tolerability of increasing donepezil from 10 to 23 mg/d in patients with moderate to severe AD. Methods: This randomized, double-blind study was conducted at 219 sites in Asia, Europe, Australia, North America, South Africa, and South America from June 6, 2007, to March 27, 2009. Patients aged 45 to 90 years with probable AD, Mini-Mental State Examination score 0 to 20 (moderate to severe impairment), and who were receiving donepezil 10 mg once daily for >= 12 weeks before the start of the study were eligible. Patients (n = 1467) were randomly assigned to receive high-dose donepezil (23 mg once daily) or standard-dose donepezil (10 mg once daily) for 24 weeks. Coprimary effectiveness measures were changes in cognition and global functioning, as assessed using least squares mean changes from baseline (LSM [SE] Delta) scores (last observation carried forward) on the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB; cognition) and the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input scale (CIBIC+; global function rating) overall change score (mean [SD]) at week 24. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed using spontaneous patient/caregiver reporting and open-ended questioning; clinical laboratory testing (hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis panels analyzed by a central laboratory); 12-lead ECG; and physical and neurologic examinations, including vital sign measurements. Results: The effectiveness analyses included 1371 patients (mean age, 73.8 years; 62.8% female; 73.5% white; weight range, 34.0-138.7 kg). A total of 296 of 981 patients (30.2%) withdrew from the donepezil 23-mg/d group; 87 of 486 patients (17.9%) withdrew from the donepezil 10-mg/d group. At study end (week 24), the LSM (SE) Delta in SIB score was significantly greater with donepezil 23 mg/d than with donepezil 10 mg/d (+2.6 [0.58] vs +0.4 [0.66], respectively; difference, 2.2; P < 0.001). The between-treatment difference in CIBIC+ score was nonsignificant (4.23 [1.07] vs 4.29 [1.07]). In post hoc analysis, LSM A in SIB score and CIBIC+ treatment effect at end point were greater with donepezil 23 mg/d than 10 mg/d in patients with more advanced AD compared with less impaired patients (SIB, +1.6 [0.78] vs -1.5 [0.88], respectively [P < 0.001]; CIBIC+, 4.31 [1.09] vs 4.42 [1.10] [P = 0.028]). TEAEs were reported in 710 of 963 patients (73.7%) who received donepezil 23 mg/d and in 300 of 471 patients (63.7%) who received donepezil 10 mg/d. With donepezil 23 mg/d, mild, moderate, and severe TEAEs were reported in 297 (30.8%), 332 (34.5%), and 81 (8.4%) patients, respectively; with donepezil 10 mg/d, these proportions were 147 (31.2%), 119 (25.3%), and 34 (7.2%). The 3 most common severe AEs reported with the 23-mg/d dose were nausea (9 patients [0.9%] vs 1 [0.2%] with the 10-mg/d dose), dizziness (7 [0.7%] vs 1 [0.2%]), and vomiting (6 [0.6%] vs 0). The most commonly reported TEAEs considered probably related to treatment with the 23-mg/d dose were nausea (59 patients [6.1%] vs 9 [1.9%] with the 10-mg/d dose), vomiting (48 [5.0%] vs 4 [0.8%]), and diarrhea (31 [3.2%] vs 7 [1.5%]). Thirteen deaths were reported during the study or within 30 days of study discontinuation (23 mg/d, 8 patients [0.8%]; 10 mg/d, 5 patients [1.1%]); all were considered unrelated to the study medication. Conclusions: In this study in patients with moderate to severe All, donepezil 23 mg/d was associated with greater benefits in cognition compared with donepezil 10 mg/d. The between-treatment difference in global functioning was not significant in the overall population. Patients with more advanced AD appeared to benefit from donepezil 23 mg/d on the assessment of global functioning, but this observation requires additional studies for confirmation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00478205. (Clin Then 2010;32:12341251) (C) 2010 Excerpta Medica Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据