4.5 Article

Analyses of drugs stored at home by elderly patients with chronic heart failure

期刊

CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
卷 104, 期 4, 页码 320-327

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-014-0783-2

关键词

Chronic heart failure; Elderly; Drugs at home; Medicines management; Healthcare costs

资金

  1. Universitat des Saarlandes
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KFO 196]
  3. Deutsche Hochdruckliga

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence-based pharmacotherapy improves morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Medication adherence management is important for the effectiveness and safety of treatment. This study investigated drugs stored at home by elderly CHF patients. One hundred and one patients with stable CHF age a parts per thousand yen65 years were visited at home where a standardized interview and a thorough assessment of medication were performed. Mean age of the patients was 77.7 +/- A 6.1 years, 53 % male, mean NYHA functional class of 2.8 +/- A 0.7 and a Minnesota-Living-with-Heart-Failure score of 59.4 +/- A 28.6 points indicating reduced quality of life. The mean number of different drug packs per patient was 13.1 +/- A 5.5, corresponding to a mean indexed value per patient of a,not sign403 +/- A 48. Cardiovascular drugs accounted for 32 % of the packs. On average, 2.4 +/- A 3.2 packs contained medication that was not taken by the patient (18 % of the medication, mean indexed value a,not sign61 +/- A 8). Fifty-six percent of the unused drugs were prescribed by general practitioners, 23 % in the hospital, and 7 % by medical specialists and 14 % were over-the-counter drugs. Sixty-three packages (5 %) of the drugs at home were expired (mean indexed value per patient a,not sign12 +/- A 3). On average, elderly patients with CHF have to manage 13 different drug packs per day at home of which a significant portion is not taken as prescribed. New strategies are needed to support medicines management at home.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据