4.5 Article

Generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: impact of depression

期刊

CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
卷 102, 期 4, 页码 269-278

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-012-0531-4

关键词

Chronic heart failure; Generic health-related quality of life; Disease-specific health-related quality of life; Depression

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Berlin) [01GL0304]
  2. German Competence Network Heart Failure (Berlin, BMBF project) [01GI0205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heart failure is known to profoundly affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We aimed to describe both generic and disease-specific HRQoL in a large community-based sample of patients with systolic heart failure (SHF) and to identify important somatic and psychosocial correlates. Seven hundred and two patients, 67 +/- A 12 years old, 71 % men, with distributions of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes I/II/III/IV of 2/55/39/4 % were included in this cross-sectional analysis. Generic HRQoL was measured with the SF-36 health survey, disease-specific HRQoL with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, and depression with the self-reported Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Both generic- and disease-specific HRQoL measurements indicated moderate to poor HRQoL. The KCCQ scores demonstrated higher sensitivity to the varying levels of heart failure severity as compared to the SF-36 scores. Patients with either a minor (15 %) or a major depression (24 %) reported significantly and substantially lower HRQoL (p < .001) than patients without depression did. In multivariable regression analyses, depression accounted for the largest part of the variance of both generic and specific HRQoL (12 and 36 %, respectively), whereas most biomedical variables had no or only a marginal influence. Patients with SHF suffer from severe limitations of HRQoL. Depression was the most important correlate of both generic and disease-specific HRQoL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据