4.5 Review

How effective are physical activity interventions for alleviating depressive symptoms in older people? A systematic review

期刊

CLINICAL REHABILITATION
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 873-887

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269215509337449

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The benefits of physical exercise in reducing clinically defined depression in the general population have been established, although a review of the evidence for older adults is needed. Objectives: To assess the efficacy of physical exercise for the treatment of depressive symptoms in older adults (>60 years). Data sources: We searched: MEDLINE (1966-May 2008); EMBASE (1980-May 2008); Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; 1982-May 2008); PsycINFO (1966-May 2008), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2008), and National Research Register (NRR; Issue 2, 2008). Review methods: Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies of physical exercise interventions for depression were included where 80% or more of participants were >60 years. Abstracts were assessed to determine whether they met specified inclusion criteria. Primary analysis focused on the prevalence of diagnosable depressive disorder following intervention. Secondary outcome was depression or mood scores on standardized scales. Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials with a total of 641 participants were included in the review. Short-term positive outcome for depression or depressive symptoms was found in nine studies, although the mode, intensity and duration of intervention varied across studies. Medium- to long-term effects of intervention were less clear. Conclusion: Physical exercise programmes obtain clinically relevant outcomes in the treatment of depressive symptoms in depressed older people. Exercise, though not appropriate for all in this population, may improve mood in this group. Further research is needed to establish medium- to long-term effects and cost-effectiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据