4.4 Article

Differentiation of transitional zone prostate cancer from benign hyperplasia nodules: Evaluation of discriminant criteria at multiparametric MRI

期刊

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
卷 68, 期 6, 页码 E323-E330

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.01.018

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To assess topographical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features in characterizing prostate transitional zone (TZ) nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two radiologists evaluated all TZ nodules visible at multiparametric MRI in 52 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. The radiologists assessed topographical (anteroposterior and superior-inferior location, crossing of the sagittal midline) and T2-weighted ( shape, presence and distinctness of capsule, distinctness of contours, presence of cysts) features, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and eight semi-quantitative and quantitative enhancement parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging. The nature of the nodules was assessed using prostatectomy specimens. Five statistical methods taking into account multiple testing were used. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-seven nodules (117 benign, 20 malignant) were evaluated. Mean ADC, all topographical, and all T2-weighted features were significant predictors of malignancy according to at least four out of the five statistical methods. Particularly, 20/20 and 18/20 cancers involved the anterior and apical third of the TZ, respectively. None of the enhancement parameters was significantly different between cancers and benign nodules. By assessing the presence of cysts, the nodules' capsule, and their anteroposterior and superior-inferior location, 111/117 benign nodules were correctly diagnosed, without misclassifying any cancer. CONCLUSION: Topographical, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted features can be used to characterize TZ nodules. DCE imaging does not seem to provide additional information. (C) 2013 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据