4.4 Article

Usefulness of concurrent reading using thin-section and thick-section CT images in subcentimetre solitary pulmonary nodules

期刊

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
卷 64, 期 2, 页码 127-132

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.09.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. Seoul RBD program [10888]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To evaluate the differences in the characterization and recommendation for follow-up of subcentimetre solitary pulmonary nodules (SSPNs) between 5 and 1 mm section CT, and to compare the assessments generated by four radiologists MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred and twenty-nine patients who had SSPNs on chest CT reconstructed using both 5 and 1 mm sections were enrolled. Two image subsets of 5 and 1 mm CT images of each nodule were interpreted independently by four radiologists. Nodule size, consistency (solid, partly solid, non-solid), the presence of calcification, and recommendations for follow-up were evaluated. If a non-calcified solid nodule was confirmed using CT, recommendation for follow-up was based on Fleischner Society guidelines. Data assessed by each radiologist were compared, and interobserver agreements were determined using the intraclass correlation coefficients and kappa value. RESULTS: Using 1 mm CT images, the nodule sizes were significantly larger than on 5 mm CT images (paired t-test, p < 0.01). The presence of calcification and nodule consistency were significantly different between 5 and 1 mm CT images (McNemar test for the presence of calcification, p < 0.01; Wilcoxon signed test for nodule consistency, p < 0.01). On 1 mm CT images there was significantly higher agreement regarding nodule consistency than on 5 mm CT (kappa - 0.78 and 0.67, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent use of thin-section and thick-section CT can provide more accurate nodule assessment and higher interobserver agreement in SSPN. (c) 2008 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据