4.4 Article

Impact of the introduction of integrated PET-CT into the preoperative staging pathway of patients with potentially operable oesophageal carcinoma

期刊

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
卷 63, 期 7, 页码 765-773

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.02.002

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To retrospectively evaluate the role of integrated positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) in oesophageal carcinoma staging, in predicting prognosis and its influence on surgical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients with potentially operable, biopsy-proven oesophageal malignancy who undergoing PET-CT from September 2004 to April 2007 were included in this study. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the accuracy of N staging with PET-CT and CT/endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) using postoperative loco-regional nodal histology as the reference standard. The prognostic value of primary tumour maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was derived using logistic regression. RESULTS: Seventeen men and eight women with a mean age of 62 years were studied. All tumours showed abnormal 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake. Fifteen patients underwent surgical resection. There was high concordance between N staging at CT/EUS (14/15) and final histology. PET-CT N staging was discordant with final nodal histology in over half of the patients (8/15). PET-CT detected occult metastases in three patients (12%) that were not identified on CT and new synchronous tumours in two patients (8%). Patient management was altered in 10 patients (40%) as a direct result of PET-CT. No statistically significant association was observed between SUVmax and clinical outcome (p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: Integrated PET-CT has a significant incremental value over conventional staging investigations mainly in the detection of distant metastases and synchronous tumours and frequently impacts on patient management. (C) 2008 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据