4.0 Article

Precompetitive assessment of heart rate variability in elite female athletes during play offs

期刊

CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 230-236

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12088

关键词

women athletes; precompetitive anxiety; volleyball players; cardiac parasympathetic function; athlete's heart; autonomic nervous system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Heart rate variability (HRV) has been rarely applied in elite athletes prior to competition. The aim of this study was to examine the changes in HRV in elite female volleyball players before a stressful match during play offs and to evaluate the impact on sport-specific performance. Methods A short-term resting HRV analysis was applied right after the night sleep in ten female athletes 1 and 2days prior to the match and the day of the competition. Results Approaching the decisive match, RR interval, resting heart rate (HR), pNN50, rMSDD and SD1 did not significantly vary. SD2 significantly increased in comparison with first-day measurement (P<0 center dot 05). HF% levels significantly decreased the prematch day and the match day (P<0 center dot 05); however, no significant changes in LF/HF% ratio were observed. A gradual increase in VLF% and in LnVLF was observed, with a significant difference between first-day and match-day measurements (PP<0 center dot 05, respectively). The number of positive receptions was inversely correlated with LF/HFms(2) ratio, with LF/HF% ratio (R=-0 center dot 98, P<0 center dot 05 for both) and with resting HR (R=-0 center dot 92, P<0 center dot 05). Conclusions Elite female athletes practising team sports exhibit a slight change in HRV prior to a decisive competition, without a pronounced variation of the autonomic nervous system activity. A day-to-day HRV measurement could be a useful tool to evaluate the impact of a competition on the autonomic nervous system in athletes, also considering the relationship between sympathetic activity and athletic performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据