4.6 Article

Adaptive Licensing: Taking the Next Step in the Evolution of Drug Approval

期刊

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 91, 期 3, 页码 426-437

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2011.345

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sloan Foundation
  2. Kauffman Foundation
  3. Merck Company Foundation
  4. Massachusetts Technology Collaborative
  5. Sanofi
  6. Alnylam
  7. Amgen
  8. Biogen-Idec
  9. Biomarin
  10. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  11. Genentech
  12. GlaxoSmithKline
  13. Inno Biologics
  14. Johnson Johnson
  15. LFB Biotechnologies
  16. Merrimack Pharmaceuticals
  17. Metabolix
  18. Millipore
  19. Novartis
  20. Pfizer
  21. Quintiles
  22. Sanofi Pasteur
  23. Burroughs Wellcome Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional drug licensing approaches are based on binary decisions. At the moment of licensing, an experimental therapy is presumptively transformed into a fully vetted, safe, efficacious therapy. By contrast, adaptive licensing (AL) approaches are based on stepwise learning under conditions of acknowledged uncertainty, with iterative phases of data gathering and regulatory evaluation. This approach allows approval to align more closely with patient needs for timely access to new technologies and for data to inform medical decisions. The concept of AL embraces a range of perspectives. Some see AL as an evolutionary step, extending elements that are now in place. Others envision a transformative framework that may require legislative action before implementation. This article summarizes recent AL proposals; discusses how proposals might be translated into practice, with illustrations in different therapeutic areas; and identifies unresolved issues to inform decisions on the design and implementation of AL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据