4.3 Article

Endothelial Cell Inflammation and Antioxidant Capacity are Associated With Exercise Performance and Microcirculation in Patients With Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease

期刊

ANGIOLOGY
卷 66, 期 9, 页码 867-874

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0003319714566863

关键词

antioxidant capacity; claudication; inflammation; peripheral artery disease

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [R01-AG-24296, AG031085, AG038747]
  2. Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology
  3. General Clinical Research Center [M01-RR-14467]
  4. American Heart Association
  5. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine [R01-AT006526]
  6. Ellison Medical Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We determined whether exercise performance and lower extremity microcirculation were associated with endothelial cell inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis and with circulating biomarkers of inflammation and antioxidant capacity in 160 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD). In a multivariate regression model for peak walking time, significant independent variables included ankle-brachial index (P < .001), age (P = .017), hydroxyl radical antioxidant capacity (P = .008), and endothelial cell nuclear factor K-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-B) activity (P = .015). In multivariate analyses for time to minimum exercise calf muscle hemoglobin oxygen saturation (StO(2)), significant independent variables included endothelial cell NF-B activity (P = .043) and calf muscle StO(2) at rest (P = .007). Endothelial cell inflammation and circulating biomarkers of inflammation and antioxidant capacity were associated with exercise performance and microcirculation of the ischemic calf musculature during exercise. The clinical implication is that interventions designed to alleviate endothelial cell inflammation and circulating inflammatory biomarkers, such as antioxidant therapy, may improve exercise performance of symptomatic patients with PAD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据