4.6 Article

Case Definition and Phenotype Standardization in Drug-Induced Liver Injury

期刊

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 89, 期 6, 页码 806-815

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2011.58

关键词

-

资金

  1. International Serious Adverse Event Consortium (iSAEC), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. SAEC
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. PfizerActelion
  6. Alnara
  7. BMS
  8. Cempra
  9. Esai
  10. Furiex
  11. Genzyme
  12. GlaxoSmithKline
  13. Gilead
  14. Hoffmann-LaRoche
  15. Idenix
  16. Johnson Johnson, TEVA
  17. Merck
  18. Novartis
  19. Nuon
  20. Orixigen
  21. Sanofi-Aventis
  22. Takeda
  23. Wyeth
  24. Sepracor
  25. Schering-Plough
  26. Enanta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the most frequent reason cited for the withdrawal of approved drugs from the market and accounts for up to 15% of the cases of acute liver failure. Investigators around the globe have begun to identify and study patients with DILI; several large registries and tissue banks are being established. In order to gain the maximum scientific benefit from these efforts, the definitions and terminology related to the clinical phenotypes of DILI must be harmonized. For this purpose, an international DILI Expert Working Group of clinicians and scientists reviewed current DILI terminology and diagnostic criteria so as to develop more uniform criteria that would define and characterize the spectrum of clinical syndromes that constitute DILI. Consensus was established with respect to the threshold criteria for definition of a case as being DILI, the pattern of liver injury, causality assessment, severity, and chronicity. Consensus was also reached on approaches to characterizing DILI in the setting of chronic liver diseases, including autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据