4.7 Article

Healing Process of Casting Pores in a Ni-based Superalloy by Hot Isostatic Pressing

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 1151-1157

出版社

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2015.07.004

关键词

Superalloy; Hot isostatic pressing (HIP); Healing

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2012CB932201]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51231006]
  3. International Cooperation Program - National Natural Science Foundation of China [51261130091]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KGZD-EW-T06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hot isostatic pressing (HIP) with a pressure of 180 MPa at a temperature of 1170 degrees C was introduced to an investment cast Ni-based superalloy (M91) turbocharger blade to explore the healing process of casting pores generated during investment casting. Optical micrograph and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations indicate that eutectic pores are the main cast defects in the as-cast blade before HIP. These pores normally locate at the solidification front of gamma/gamma' eutectic with a size of a few micrometers to a few tens of micrometers. After HIP for 4 h, most of the pores were closed. Based on phase characteristics, these pores were healed by the formation of. matrix with finer and irregular-shaped gamma' precipitates. Healing interface can be easily distinguished by SEM. Line scan by using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) reveals a much higher Ti and Al concentration in the healing interface. It is proposed that solute diffusion toward the casting pores during HIP results in the formation of gamma, and the much higher concentration of gamma'-forming elements Al and Ti near the healing interface contributes to the precipitation of gamma' in the healed region in the succeeding cooling process after HIP. Copyright (C) 2015, The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology. Published by Elsevier Limited. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据