4.7 Article

Instrumented and Vickers Indentation for the Characterization of Stiffness, Hardness and Toughness of Zirconia Toughened Al2O3 and SiC Armor

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 773-783

出版社

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2015.06.005

关键词

Zirconia toughened alumina; Silicon carbide; Armor; Vickers indentation fracture toughness; Elastic modulus; Vickers hardness

资金

  1. DRDC-Valcartier [A1-000968]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Instrumented and Vickers indentation testing and microstructure analysis were used to investigate zirconia toughened alumina (ZTA) and silicon carbide (SiC). Several equations were studied to relate the Vickers indentation hardness, Young's modulus and crack behavior to the fracture toughness. The fracture in SiC is unstable and occurs primarily by cleavage leading to a relatively low toughness of 3 MPa m(1/2), which may be inappropriate for multi-hit capability. ZTA absorbs energy by plastic deformation, pore collapse, crack deviation and crack bridging and exhibits time dependent creep. With a relatively high toughness around 6.6 MPa m(1/2), ZTA is promising for multi-hit capability. The higher accuracy of median equations in calculating the indentation fracture toughness and the relatively high c/a ratios above 2.5 suggest median type cracking for both SiC and ZTA. The Young's modulus of both ceramics was most accurately measured at lower indentation loads of about 0.5 kgf, while more accurate hardness and fracture toughness values were obtained at intermediate and at higher indentation loads beyond 5 kgf, respectively. A strong indentation size effect (ISE) was observed in both materials. The load independent hardness of SiC is 2563 HV, putting it far above the standard armor hardness requirement of 1500 HV that is barely met by ZTA. Copyright (C) 2015, The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology. Published by Elsevier Limited. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据