4.6 Article

Mixing Method Affects Elution and Strength of High-dose ALBC: A Pilot Study

期刊

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
卷 470, 期 10, 页码 2677-2683

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2351-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Southwest Orthopaedic Trauma Association (SWOTA) (RBM)
  2. Herbert Louis Fund at the OREF (ACM)
  3. Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-dose antimicrobial-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is used to treat orthopaedic infections. High-dose ALBC is not commercially available and requires surgeon directed formulation, and there are several different methods used to mix high-dose ALBC. We asked whether the mixing method affected antimicrobial elution and mechanical properties of high-dose ALBC. ALBC was formulated with Simplex(A (R)) P bone cement and 10 g of vancomycin per batch using one of three mixing methods: (1) hand-stirred using a standard bowl and spatula, (2) bowl-mixed using a mechanical mixing bowl, and (3) dough-phase mixing where the vancomycin was left in chunks (1-5 mm) and folded into the cement during the dough phase after adding the monomer. We eluted 45 standardized test cylinders (15 per mixing technique) for 30 days under infinite sink conditions. We tested 135 (45 per mixing method) similarly eluted cylinders in axial compression to failure. Dough-phase mixing lead to greater antimicrobial delivery, but lower compressive strength than the hand-stirred or bowl-mixed methods. Dough-phase cement released 18,570 lg of vancomycin versus 11,731 for hand-stirred and 7700 mu g for bowl mixed. Compressive strength for dough-phase mixing after 30 days of elution was 36 MPa, while both hand-stirred and bowl mixed cements were 56 MPa. Performance of high-dose ALBC was affected by mixing method. Dough-phase mixing led to greater antimicrobial delivery, but caused greater loss in compressive strength.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据