4.6 Article

Function After Injection of Benign Bone Lesions with a Bioceramic

期刊

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
卷 470, 期 7, 页码 2014-2020

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2251-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, TN, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate composite injectable bone graft substitute has been approved by the FDA for filling bone defects in a nonweightbearing application based on preclinical studies. Its utility has not been documented in the literature. We therefore determined postoperative function and complications in patients with benign bone lesions treated with this bioceramic. We retrospectively reviewed all 56 patients with benign bone lesions treated with the bioceramic from 2006 to 2008. There were 29 male and 27 female patients with an average age of 17.6 years (range, 4-63 years). They were treated for the following diagnoses: unicameral bone cyst (13), aneurysmal bone cyst (10), nonossifying fibroma (eight), fibrous dysplasia (five), enchondroma (four), chondroblastoma (four), and other (12). We obtained a Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional evaluation on all patients. The minimum followup was 26 months (average, 42 months; range, 26-57 months). The average MSTS score was 29 (range, 20-30). Most patients returned to normal function. There were three local recurrences, all of which were treated with repeat injection or curettage. Two patients had postoperative fractures treated in a closed manner. Two patients had wound complications, neither of which required removal of the graft material. Patients treated with this material reported high MSTS functional scores more than 24 months after operative intervention and experienced low complication rates. We believe the novel bioceramic to be a reasonable treatment option for benign bone lesions. Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据