4.5 Article

Detection of herpesviruses and human papillomavirus in acute apical abscesses by real-time PCR

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 343-347

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1251-0

关键词

Acute apical abscess; Epstein-Barr virus; Human cytomegalovirus; Human papillomavirus; Polymerase chain reaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based molecular methods to detect herpesviruses in periradicular lesions has suggested that some herpesviruses, especially human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can participate in the pathogenesis of the periradicular lesions. Based on the applicability of molecular techniques for virus identification, the aim of the study was to investigate the presence of HCMV, EBV, and human papillomavirus (HPV) in samples from acute apical abscesses. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in Turkish population to survey apical abscess samples for the presence of herpesviruses and HPV. Microbial samples were collected from 27 apical abscess specimens and 6 control samples. DNA was extracted from clinical samples by using spin column-based nucleic acid purification method, and viral loads were evaluated using real-time PCR methods following the kit protocols recommended by the manufacturers. HCMV DNA was found alone in five (18.5 %) samples, EBV DNA alone in two (7.4 %), HPV DNA alone in two (7.4 %), and in one, both HCMV and EBV (4 %). As for the healthy pulps used as noninflamed controls, no control specimens contained HCMV, EBV, or HPV DNA. The present PCR-based findings have identified HCMV, EBV, and HPV as an inhabitant of acute apical abscesses. Additional studies using in vitro or animal model systems are required to elucidate the role of HCMV, EBV, and HPV in the pathogenesis of periapical pathosis. The present viral findings may have future therapeutic relevance for periapical abscesses and other periapical pathosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据