期刊
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 567-572出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12117
关键词
bone repair; osteogenesis; bone marrow; cell transplantation; stromal cells
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the bone healing observed after the use of (1) a scaffold enriched with fresh bone marrow, (2) a scaffold enriched with bone marrow mononuclear fraction, and (3) a scaffold alone. Material and methods Twenty one rabbits were randomly divided into three groups of six animals and 1 group of 3 animals. Bilateral 12-mm diameter defects were created in the animals' parietal bones. In Control Group, the defects were filled with a xenograft alone (n=6); in Group 1, with a xenograft enriched with fresh bone marrow (n=6); in Group 2, with a xenograft enriched with bone marrow mononuclear fraction (n=6) and in Unfilled Group, nothing was grafted (n=3). In Groups 1, 2, and Control, one of the calvarial defects was randomly covered with a barrier membrane. The rabbits were sacrificed 8weeks after surgery, and their parietal bones were harvested and analyzed histomorphometrically. Results The histomorphometric analysis showed no difference between Group 1 and the Control Group regarding non-vital mineralized tissue area, but Group 2 showed a statistically significant higher percentage than the Control Group (P<0.05) for both situations, with membrane (21.24 +/- 3.78% and 13.52 +/- 3.00%, respectively) and without membrane (20.91 +/- 2.01% and 13.08 +/- 1.72%, respectively). Group 2 showed the highest percentage of vital mineralized tissue area, followed by Group 1 and the Control Group (P<0.05) for both situations, with membrane (28.17 +/- 3.19%; 21.14 +/- 7.38% and 13.06 +/- 5.24%, respectively) and without membrane (21.13 +/- 0.55%; 12.45 +/- 6.34% and 6.56 +/- 1.20%, respectively). Group 2 showed the lowest percentage of non-mineralized tissue area, followed by Group 1 and Control Group (P<0.05) for both situations, with membrane (50.59 +/- 6.64%; 58.75 +/- 7.14% and 73.41 +/- 6.87%, respectively) and without membrane (57.97 +/- 1.91%; 71.74 +/- 6.63% and 80.37 +/- 2.67%, respectively). The sides in which the defects were covered with the barrier membrane showed better bone healing compared with the uncovered sides, in all groups (intragroup comparison, P<0.05). The Unfilled Group specimens showed no bone formation. Conclusions Both methods using bone marrow stromal cells contributed to enhancing bone healing, especially that using the bone marrow mononuclear fraction. The use of a barrier membrane seemed to have a synergistic effect.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据