4.5 Article

Implant-guided vertical bone growth in the mini-pig

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 751-757

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02199.x

关键词

biomaterial scaffold; ng; rhBMP-2; scaffold retainer; vertical supracrestal bone growth

资金

  1. Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To attain and describe guided vertical bone regeneration around titanium (Ti) and titanium zirconium (TiZr) dental implants utilizing non-glycosylated recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (ng/rhBMP-2), biomaterial scaffolds and a scaffold retainer. Materials and methods: Thirty-two modified Straumann TE implants were partially embedded in the mandibles of eight adult mini-pigs. Pre-shaped resorbable scaffolds were placed around the implant and shielded and stabilized with a newly developed Ti custom scaffold retainer (umbrella) or wide-neck (WN) healing caps to stabilize the scaffold. Ng/rhBMP-2 (50 mu g) was applied to the supracrestal portion of the implant or incorporated within the scaffold. At 9 weeks, soft tissue healing was assessed. Vertical bone regeneration outcomes including bone height, bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone volume were assessed by micro-computed tomography and histology. Results: Soft tissue healing at the test sites (+ng/rhBMP-2/+scaffold) appeared to be substantially better than the control sites (-ng/rhBMP-2/-scaffold). Bone height, BIC percentage and bone volume were all similar regardless of whether WN healing caps or umbrella scaffold stabilization was used for all biomaterial scaffolds tested. WN healing cap test sites showed greater new bone height and BIC as compared with aggregate data from the control sites (P=0.05). Comparison of aggregate data from the umbrella test sites showed greater BIC and new bone volume as compared with aggregate data from the control sites(P=0.05). Conclusion: Vertical bone regeneration was successfully attained utilizing ng/rhBMP-2, biomaterial scaffolds and a scaffold retainer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据