4.5 Article

Long-term results after lateral and osteotome technique sinus floor elevation: a retrospective analysis of 2190 implants over a time period of 15 years

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 497-503

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01661.x

关键词

autogenous bone; Bio-Oss (R); bone substitute material; complications; follow-up; lateral sinus floor elevation; long-term results

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background During a time period of 15 years (1992-2007), 2190 implants were inserted in 983 patients after sinus floor elevation. Materials and methods One thousand two hundred and seven implants (461 patients) were placed into sites, in which the sinus was augmented using the lateral approach (LSFE), and 983 implants (522 patients) in sites augmented with the osteotome technique. Bovine bone mineral (n=1217), beta-tricalcium phosphate (n=126), and in some cases, only autogenous bone were used for augmentation in the LSFE. Generally, bone chips that were collected during the preparation of the osteotomy were added to the bone substitutes. No additional augmentation materials were used for augmentation with the osteotome technique. A retrospective analysis of the treatment results was assessed by patients documentations that were recorded in the impDAT(R) - Program and by the evaluation of pre-, and post-surgical orthopantomograms. Results The implant survival analysis according to Kaplan-Meier showed 97.1% after 176 months of loading for both sinus floor elevation techniques. Discussion and conclusion The evaluation with respect to the augmentation material used did not reveal significant differences in the implant survival rate and in both cases remodelling processes could be observed in the augmented area. To cite this article:Tetsch J, Tetsch P, Lysek DA. Long-term results after lateral and osteotome technique sinus floor elevation: a retrospective analysis of 2190 implants over a time period of 15 years.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 497-503.doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01661.x.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据