4.4 Article

Definitive Chemoradiation for Oesophageal Cancer - a Standard of Care in Patients with Non-metastatic Oesophageal Cancer

期刊

CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 182-188

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.12.001

关键词

Definitive chemoradiation; inoperable; oesophageal cancer

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [7256] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Cancer Research UK [7256] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: A retrospective analysis was carried out of 291 cases of oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) at a single UK cancer centre between 1995 and 2009. Our protocol consisted of two cycles of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by two further cycles given concurrently with 50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy delivered in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Materials and methods: Demographic, patient and outcome data were recorded prospectively through an electronic health record and retrospectively analysed, using appropriate statistical tools. Results: Data on 266 patients were available for analysis. The median age was 66.6 years, 53% were adenocarcinomas. dCRT was used instead of surgery because of age/co-morbidity in 44% and disease extent in 39%. Ninety-three per cent of patients completed treatment according to protocol. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were seen in 42 and 7%, respectively. Median survival was 20.6 months; 2, 3 and 5 year survival rates were 43.6, 32.9 and 19.5%, respectively. Advanced disease was associated with a worse outcome. Shorter disease length was associated with a better median survival, but some patients with disease >10 cm had long-term disease control. The effect of other patient- and disease-related factors was also analysed. Conclusion: We present data showing that dCRT is well tolerated and should be considered as an alternative to surgery for all patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer, not only those with co-morbidity. Furthermore, the benefits of dCRT are not confined to carcinomas with squamous histology. (C) 2010 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据