4.7 Article

Sarcopenia: Prevalence and prognostic significance in hospitalized patients

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 772-776

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.01.010

关键词

Sarcopenia; Older people; Outcome; Nutrition; Acute illness

资金

  1. HEALTH FOUNDATION

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Sarcopenia is prevalent in older populations with many causes and varying outcomes however information for use in clinical practice is still lacking. Aims: The aim of this report is to identify the clinical determinants and prognostic significance of sarcopenia in a cohort of hospitalized acutely ill older patients. Methods: Four hundred and thirty two randomly selected patients had their baseline clinical characteristic data assessed within 72 h of admission, at 6 weeks and at 6 months. Nutritional status was assessed from anthropometric and biochemical data. Sarcopenia was diagnosed from low muscle mass and low muscle strength-hand grip using anthropometric measures based on the European Working Group criteria. Results: Compared with patients without sarcopenia, those diagnosed with sarcopenia 44 (10%) were more likely to be older, have more depression symptoms and lower serum albumin concentration. The length of hospital stay (LOS) was significantly longer in patients diagnosed with sarcopenia compared with patients without sarcopenia [mean (SD) LOS 13.4 (8.8) versus 9.4 (7) days respectively, p = 0.003]. The risk of non-elective readmission in the 6 months follow up period was significantly lower in patients without sarcopenia compared with those diagnosed with sarcopenia (adjusted hazard ratio .53 (95% CI: .32 to .87, p = 0.013). The death rate was also lower in patients without sarcopenia 38/388 (10%), compared with those with sarcopenia 12/44 (27%), p-value = .001. Conclusion: Older people with sarcopenia have poor clinical outcome following acute illness compared with those without sarcopenia. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据