4.7 Article

Prebiotic supplementation in preterm neonates: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 958-965

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.05.009

关键词

Prebiotic oligosaccharides; Bifidobacteria; Lactobacillus; Necrotising enterocolitis; Enteral feeds; Sepsis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & aims: Regular administration of prebiotic oligosaccharides promote beneficial gut flora in infants. We aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of prebiotic oligosaccharide supplementation in preterm infants <= 37 weeks of gestation. Methods: Available studies from Medline, Embase, comparing formula milk supplemented with or without prebiotics, reporting on safety and the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), late onset sepsis, feed tolerance, physical growth and various stool characteristics were eligible. Results: 7 trials (n = 417) were included. Five trials (n = 345) reported on the incidence of NEC, 3 trials (n = 295) reported on the incidence of late onset sepsis. Meta-analysis revealed a pooled RR (95% CI) of 1.24 (0.56-2.72) for NEC, 0.81 (0.57-1.15), p 0.23 for the risk of late onset sepsis. 3 individual trials (n = 295) did not observe any improvement in time to enteral feeds post intervention. Meta-analysis indicated a statistically significant difference in the growth of bifidobacteria in the oligosaccharide group with a weighted mean difference of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.73) *10(6) colonies/g, p < 0.00001. A reduction in stool viscosity and pH was also observed. None of the trials reported life threatening adverse effects. Conclusions: Supplementation with prebiotic oligosaccharides was safe and did not result in decreased incidence of NEC, late onset sepsis and time to full enteral feeds but resulted in a significantly higher growth of beneficial microbes. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据