期刊
CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 875-881出版社
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.04.002
关键词
Nutritional screening; Nutritional assessment; Malnutrition; Bioelectrical impedance analysis; Phase angle
资金
- Foundation Nutrition2000Plus
Background Er aims: Low phase angle (PhA) by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), is associated with increased morbidity and nutritional risk. This study determined the cut-off values for PhA compared to Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) in patients at hospital admission, and evaluated the association between PhA and serum albumin. Methods: PhA was determined in patients (Men (M)/Women (W) = 382/267), and healthy age-, sex- and height-matched controls. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for PhA compared to NRS-2002, SGA and serum albumin. The cut-off values were assessed by receiver operator characteristics area under the curve (ROC-AUC). Results: The best PhA cut-offs were 5.0 degrees and 4.6 degrees in M/W. The sensitivity for NRS-2002 was 70.0/58.1% (M/W); SGA: 73.3/64.5%; albumin: 58.8/23.5%; specificity for NRS-2002: 85.1/81.7%.(M/W); SGA: 76.6/76.1% and albumin: 93.2/96.6%. The PhA showed a ROC-AUC for NRS-2002 of 0.85/0.80 (M/W); SGA: 0.83/0.80 and albumin: 0.85/0.91. Patients with albumin levels <35 g/L had a relative risk of 7.5 to have low PhA compared to patients with >= 35 g/L Conclusions: The consistent sensitivity and specificity between PhA and three screening tools strengthens the validity of our study. PhA appears to be a useful screening tool to assess nutritional risk without having to measure weight or height. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据