4.7 Review

Older adults and patients in need of nutritional support: Review of current treatment options and factors influencing nutritional intake

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 160-169

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.09.003

关键词

Oral Nutritional Supplement; Elderly; Volume; Energy density; Malnutrition; Nutrition support

资金

  1. Danone Research, Center for Specialised Nutrition, Wageningen The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & aims: Many older adults and patients do not achieve sufficient nutritional intake to support their minimal needs and are at risk of, or are suffering from, (protein-energy) malnutrition. Better understanding of current treatment options and factors determining nutritional intake, may help design new strategies to solve this multifactorial problem. Methods: Medline, Science Citation Index, ScienceDirect and Google databases (until December 2008) were searched with the keywords malnutrition, elderly, older adults, food intake, energy density, variety, taste, satiety, and appetite. Results: 37 Factors affecting nutritional intake were identified and divided in three categories: those related to the environment, the person, and the food. For older adults in nursing homes, encouragement by carers and an appropriate ambiance seem particularly important. Meal fortification, offering variety, providing frequent small meals, snacks and particularly Oral Nutritional Supplements (ONS) between meals are other possibilities for this group. Product factors that stimulate intake include palatability, high energy density, low volume, and liquid format. Conclusion: The current review gives a comprehensive overview of factors affecting nutritional intake and may help carers to improve nutritional intake in their patients. The product factors identified here suggest that especially small volume, energy and nutrient dense ONS can be effective to improve nutritional intake. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据