4.7 Article

Serum concentration and dietary intake of vitamins A and E in low-income South African elderly

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 119-123

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.08.001

关键词

Elderly; Nutrition; Vitamin A; Vitamin E; Diet; Serum

资金

  1. National Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & aims: Adequate dietary intake of antioxidants is vital for the promotion of health, well being and longevity of the elderly. This study assessed the prevalence of vitamin A (retinol) and vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) deficiency in a population of low-income South African elderly. Methods: Serum vitamin A and vitamin E concentrations were determined in 235 persons aged 60-93 years in Sharpeville, South Africa. Dietary assessment was done using 24-h recall. Weight and height were measured to determine body mass index. Results: The mean and standard deviation of serum levels in the elderly were 1.41 +/- 1.4 mu mol/L for vitamin A and 2.1 +/- 1.1 mg/l for vitamin E. The proportion with deficient serum vitamin A was 28.2% and 26.5% for men and women respectively and 20.5% and 20.9% respectively for deficient vitamin E concentrations. Almost one-third of the subjects consumed less than 100% of the Estimated Average Requirement for both vitamins. Mean vitamin A intake was 426 +/- 666 mu g in men and 368 +/- 811 mu g in women, mean vitamin E intake for men and women was 5.4 +/- 5.2 mu g and 4.0 +/- 0.5 mg respectively. The predominant macronutrient consumed was carbohydrate. No relationship existed between biochemical and dietary intake parameters of vitamins A and E. Conclusions: These findings indicate poor dietary intake and high prevalence of vitamins A and E deficiency among this elderly population. Sustainable community-based interventions are needed to address this nutritional vulnerability in this community. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据