4.7 Article

Protective effect of a coffee preparation (Nescafe pure (R)) against carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis in rats

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 399-405

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.12.007

关键词

Coffee; Liver fibrosis; Carbon tetrachloride; Hepatic stellate cell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & aims: We examined the effects of a coffee preparation on liver fibrosis induced by carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) and explored the possible mechanisms. Methods: Rats were divided randomly into four groups: control. CCl4, and two coffee preparation groups. Except for the control group, liver fibrosis was induced in male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats by subcutaneous injection with 40% CCl4 twice a week for 8 weeks. At the same time, a coffee preparation (300 mg/kg and 150 mg/kg) was administered to the two coffee preparation groups intragastrically once daily. Results: Upon pathological examination, a coffee preparation treatment significantly reduced liver damage and symptoms of liver fibrosis. The mRNA expression of collagen I, collagen III, bcl-2, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) were markedly increased by CCl4 treatment but suppressed by a coffee preparation treatment. Whereas compared with the CCl4 group, the mRNA expression of Bax was increased in the coffee preparation group. The protein expression of Bax and bcl-2 were confirmed by western blot. Intragastric administration of a coffee preparation reduced the protein expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) and the glucose-regulated proteins (GRP) 78 and 94 in rats increased by CCl4. Conclusions: Our data indicate that a coffee preparation can efficiently inhibit CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in rats. The coffee preparation may therefore be a potential functional food for preventing liver fibrosis. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据