4.7 Article

Alpha-lipoic acid modifies oxidative stress parameters in sickle cell trait subjects and sickle cell patients

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 192-197

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.01.017

关键词

Oxidative stress; Nutrition; Lipoic acid; Sickle cell disease

资金

  1. Funda do de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul [0521456]
  2. Coordenacao de aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & aims: Oxidative stress plays a crucial role in the sickle cell disease. Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is a potent antioxidant that is employed in the treatment of several diseases. The objective of this study was to test the ALA effect in the sickle cell disease (SCD) treatment. Methods: Sixty subjects were selected and divided into groups according to the hemoglobin profile: AA (normal), AS (SCD trait subject) and SS (SCD patient). Patients were randomized into a placebo-controlled trial and treated with either ALA (200 mg) or vehicle. Blood samples were collected before supplementation and after 3 months of treatment. Catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activities and total antioxidant status (TAS) were evaluated as measure of antioxidant defense. Lipid and protein damages were quantified by malondialdehyde (MDA) and carbonyl assays, respectively. Results: CAT activity significantly increased in the AS group after ALA treatment and GPx activity presented significant decrease in all groups. SOD activity was not different in any group. Data on MDA and carbonyl levels showed significant reduction in the AA group with ALA treatment. TAS decreased in the same group. Conclusion: ALA treatment protected AA individuals from oxidative damage to lipids and proteins. In SCD subjects, the dose applied was not effective to prevent the oxidative damage. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据