4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The anabolic effect of arginine on proteins in skin wound and muscle is independent of nitric oxide production

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 649-656

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.01.006

关键词

arginine; protein metabolism; muscle; wound; rabbits; stable isotopes

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR49038] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & aims: L-Arginine may play a role in regulation of protein metabolism. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of L-arginine supplementation on protein metabolism in skin wound and muscle in anesthetized rabbits. Methods: L-[ring-C-13(6)]Phenylalanine was infused as a tracer on day 7 after ear injury, and the scalded ear and uninjured hindlimb were used as arteriovenous units to reflect protein kinetics in these two tissues. In study 1, an amino acid mixture (10% Travasol) was infused either atone at 1.5 ml/kg per h or at 0.75 ml/kg per h with supplemental L-arginine to deliver comparable amount of amino acid nitrogen. In study 2, N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester was infused to inhibit nitric oxide synthase during the stable isotope infusion. Results: In study 1, arginine supplementation increased (p < 0.05) net protein balance in skin wound and muscle from -6.7 +/- 6.2 to -0.8 +/- 3.8 and from -4.4 +/- 2.4 to -1.9 +/- 1.5 mu mol phenylalanine/100 g per h, respectively, indicating an anabolic effect. In study 2, the N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester infusion markedly reduced the blood flow rate in the scalded ear and increased (p < 0.05) net protein balance in skin wound and in muscle from -8.6 +/- 3.4 to -1.0 +/- 5.7 and from -3.9 +/- 1.3 to -2.2 +/- 0.5 mu mol phenylalanine/100 g per h, respectively. Conclusions: Arginine supplementation increased net protein balance in skin wound and muscle by a mechanism which was independent of nitric oxide production. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据