4.6 Article

Quantifying Morphology of Sands Using 3D Imaging

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001246

关键词

Surface roughness; Sphericity; Roundness; Shape; Sand; Granular materials; Friction; Microscopic analysis; Three-dimensional (3D); Synchrotron computed tomography

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1266230]
  2. GeoSoilEnviroCARS (Sector 13)
  3. National Science Foundation, Earth Sciences [EAR-1128799]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Geosciences [DE-FG02-94ER14466]
  5. DOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  6. Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  7. Directorate For Engineering
  8. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1266230] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particle morphology plays a significant role in influencing engineering behavior of granular materials. Surface texture, roundness, and sphericity represent distinct multiscale measures needed to fully describe particle morphology. Most studies reported in the literature rely on two-dimensional (2D) projected images of particles with a few three-dimensional (3D) images that mostly focused on relatively large-size aggregate samples. In this paper, 3D synchrotron microcomputed tomography (SMT) was used to acquire high-resolution images of glass beads, F-35 Ottawa sand, #1 dry glass sand, GS#40 Columbia sand, Toyoura sand, and Hostun RF sand. New roundness and sphericity indexes are proposed and calculated for the samples based on 3D measurements of surface area, volume, and three orthogonal diameters of particles. In addition, the surface texture of particles were measured using optical interferometry technique. The measurements reported in this paper can serve as a good source for other researchers working on sands to build on these intrinsic particle properties to link engineering behavior of sands to their morphology. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据