4.8 Article

Probing the Effect of Molecular Nonuniformity in Directed Self-Assembly of Diblock Copolymers in Nanoconfined Space

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 9594-9602

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn505886z

关键词

block copolymer; nanolithography; confined self-assembly; molecular nonuniformity; bottom-up lithography

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science [024.001.035]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  3. European Research Council
  4. ERC [246829]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [246829] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various complex self-assembled morphologies of lamellar- and cylinder-forming block copolymers comprising poly(dimethylsiloxane)-b-polylactide (PDMS-b-PLA) confined in cylindrical channels were generated. Combining top-down lithography with bottom-up block copolymer self-assembly grants access to morphologies that are otherwise inaccessible with the bulk materials. Channel diameter (D) was systematically varied with four diblock copolymers having different compositions and bulk domain spacing (L-0), corresponding to a range of frustration ratios (D/L-0 from 2 to 4). Excessive packing frustration imposed by the channels leads to contorted domains. The resulting morphologies depend strongly on both D/L-0 and copolymer composition. Under several circumstances, mixtures of complex morphologies were observed, which hypothetically arise from the severe sensitivity to D/L-0 combined with the inherent compositional/molar mass dispersities associated with the nonuniform synthetic materials and silicon templates. Stochastic calculations offer compelling support for the hypothesis, and tractable pathways toward solving this apparent conundrum are proposed. The materials hold great promise for next-generation nanofabrication to address several emerging technologies, offering significantly enhanced versatility to basic diblock copolymers as templates for fabricating complex nanoscale objects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据