4.6 Article

Corticomuscular coherence in acute and chronic stroke

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 125, 期 6, 页码 1182-1191

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.11.006

关键词

CMC; Reorganization; Motor recovery; EEG; EMG; Synchronization; Oscillations

资金

  1. Center for Stroke Research Berlin
  2. Berlin Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Motor recovery after stroke is attributed to neuronal plasticity, however not all post-stroke neuronal changes relate to regaining fine motor control. Corticomuscular coherence (CMC) is a measure allowing to trace neuronal reorganizations which are functionally relevant for motor recovery. Contrary to previous studies which were performed only in chronic stage, we measured CMC in patients with stroke at both acute and chronic stroke stages. Methods: For the detection of CMC we used multichannel EEG and EMG recordings along with an optimization algorithm for the detection of corticomuscular interactions. Results: In acute stroke, the CMC amplitude was larger on the unaffected side compared to the affected side and also larger compared to the unaffected side in the chronic period. Additionally, CMC peak frequencies on both sides decreased in the acute compared to the chronic period and to control subjects. In chronic stage, there were no inter-hemispheric or group differences in CMC amplitude or frequency. Conclusions: The changes in CMC parameters in acute stroke could result from a temporary decrease in inhibition, which normalizes in the course of recovery. As all patients showed very good motor recovery, the modulation of CMC amplitude and frequency over time might thus reflect the process of motor recovery. Significance: We demonstrate for the first time the dynamical changes of corticomuscular interaction both at acute and chronic stage of stroke. (C) 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据