4.6 Article

Prognostic value of EEG asymmetries for development of drug-resistance in drug-naive patients with genetic generalized epilepsies

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 125, 期 2, 页码 263-269

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.028

关键词

EEG; IGE; GGE; Spike-wave asymmetries; Drug resistance

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS062092] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Previous studies based solely on visual EEG analysis reported equivocal results regarding an association of pharmaco-resistance with EEG asymmetries in genetic generalized epilepsies (GGE). We addressed this issue by applying both visual and quantitative methods to the pretreatment EEG of GGE patients. Methods: Socio-demographic/disease characteristics and response to treatment/discontinuation trial for these patients were recorded at 6 months and at last follow up. The first EEG was retrospectively, blindly, and visually assessed for focal slowing, focal discharges and also quantitatively analyzed for amplitude or latency asymmetries of generalized discharges. Association between these variables and development of drug-resistance was evaluated. Results: Out of 51 subjects, 40% had some type of EEG asymmetry by visual, 37% by quantitative and 54% by combined analysis. Drug-resistance was identified in 52% of patients after 6 months and in 24% at the end of the follow up period (similar to 4.2 years). 27% of patients underwent a discontinuation trial; 43% unsuccessfully. There was no association between baseline EEG asymmetries of any type and refractoriness to medical therapy, regardless of analytical method used. Conclusions: In a carefully selected cohort of medication-naive GGE patients, visual and quantitative asymmetries in the first EEG were not associated with the development of pharmaco-resistance. Significance: These findings do not provide support for utilization of EEG asymmetries as a prognostic tool in GGE. (C) 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据