4.6 Article

Functional MRI of sleep spindles and K-complexes

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 123, 期 2, 页码 303-309

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.06.018

关键词

Electroencephalography (EEG); Functional MRI (fMRI); Spindles; K-complexes; Sleep; Non-REM

资金

  1. NIH-NINDS K23 [NS044936]
  2. Leff Family Foundation
  3. Vradenburg Family Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Sleep spindles and K-complexes are EEG hallmarks of non-REM sleep. However, the brain regions generating these discharges and the functional connections of their generators to other regions are not fully known. We investigated the neuroanatomical correlates of spindles and K-complexes using simultaneous EEG and fMRI. Methods: EEGs recorded during EEG-fMRI studies of 7 individuals were used for fMRI analysis. Higher-level group analyses were performed, and images were thresholded at Z >= 2.3. Results: fMRI of 106 spindles and 60 K-complexes was analyzed. Spindles corresponded to increased signal in thalami and posterior cingulate, and right precuneus, putamen, paracentral cortex, and temporal lobe. K-complexes corresponded to increased signal in thalami, superior temporal lobes, paracentral gyri, and medial regions of the occipital, parietal and frontal lobes. Neither corresponded to regions of decreased signal. Conclusions: fMRI of both spindles and K-complexes depicts signal subjacent to the vertex, which likely indicates each discharges' source. The thalamic signal is consistent with thalamic involvement in sleep homeostasis. The limbic region's signal is consistent with roles in memory consolidation. Unlike the spindle, the K-complex corresponds to extensive signal in primary sensory cortices. Significance: Identification of these active regions contributes to the understanding of sleep networks and the physiology of awareness and memory during sleep. (C) 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据