4.6 Article

Abnormal visual habituation in pediatric photosensitive epilepsy

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 122, 期 1, 页码 16-20

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.06.002

关键词

Photosensitivity; Epilepsy; Habituation; Sensory gating; Pattern-reversal VEP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate visual habituation - a measure of visual cortical excitability - in photosensitive patients in pediatric age and compare the findings with a matched sample with idiopathic generalized epilepsies without photosensitivity and with normally developing children. Methods: We presented a full-field black-and-white checkerboard pattern, at 3 reversal/s with 100% contrast binocularly for 600 consecutive trials and measured the N75-P100 and P100-N145 pattern-reversal visual evoked potential inter-peak amplitudes and N75, P100, N145 latencies for the six blocks of 100 responses. As a measure of habituation we used the slope of the linear regression line of the N75-P100 and P100-N145 peak-to-peak amplitudes. The slope of the linear regression line of the N75-P100 and P100-N145 latencies was also analyzed. Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the three groups in the slope index of N75-P100 PR-VEP amplitude, with increased or constant amplitude in the PS group compare to the IGE and ND across the six blocks. Conclusions: Our results support the notion that photosensitivity is associated with altered control of excitatory and inhibitory cortical processes. The causal relationship between habituation deficit and photo-paroxysmal response needs to be further investigated with longitudinal studies. Significance: This study supports the hypothesis that suppression of PR-VEP is a sensitive intermediate phenotype, which discriminates patients with photosensitivity from those with generalized epilepsies in pediatric age. (C) 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据