4.6 Article

The effect of measurement error on the test-retest reliability of repeated mismatch negativity measurements

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 122, 期 11, 页码 2195-2202

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.04.004

关键词

Auditory event-related potentials; Electroencephalogram; ERP; Measurement error; Mismatch negativity; Test-retest reliability

资金

  1. Graduate School of Electrical and Communications Engineering, Society of Electronics Engineers
  2. Academy of Finland (National Centers of Excellence)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The aim was to study how the measurement error affects the repeatability of mismatch negativity (MMN) measurements. Methods: Event-related potentials (ERPs) to changes in sound frequency, location, intensity, duration, and composition were recorded five times during 1-3 weeks from 13 healthy adults using a multi-feature MMN paradigm. The accumulation of MMN was modeled empirically with respect to measurement error, and repeatability was estimated at 0.6-3.5-mu V error levels. The analysis was made for the results in the single deviant conditions and their pattern (auditory discrimination profile). Results: At the single-subject level, the measurement error significantly affected the repeatability until it went below 9-17% of MMN peak amplitude. At the group level, the threshold was higher. Peak amplitude was generally the most repeatable parameter. Latency was superior when the error was moderate or small (<2-3 mu V). Conclusions: The measurement error affects the repeatability of MMN. In single-subject studies, it should not be neglected if it exceeds 10% of the MMN amplitude. The application of the auditory discrimination profile is recommended for future applications. Significance: The study provided quantitative results to support the discussion on improving the repeatability of the MMN measurements. They are expected to apply conditionally to other ERP measurements, too. (C) 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据