4.6 Article

Assessment of EEG dynamical complexity in Alzheimer's disease using multiscale entropy

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 121, 期 9, 页码 1438-1446

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.03.025

关键词

Alzheimer's disease (AD); Electroencephalogram (EEG); Complexity; Multiscale entropy (MSE); Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); Power analysis

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [20790833]
  2. NIMH [K08 MH080329]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20790833] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Multiscale entropy (MSE) is a recently proposed entropy-based index of physiological complexity, evaluating signals at multiple temporal scales. To test this method as an aid to elucidating the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD), we examined MSE in resting state EEG activity in comparison with traditional EEG analysis. Methods: We recorded EEG in medication-free 15 presenile AD patients and 18 age-and sex-matched healthy control (HC) subjects. MSE was calculated for continuous 60-s epochs for each group, concurrently with power analysis. Results: The MSE results from smaller and larger scales were associated with higher and lower frequencies of relative power, respectively. Group analysis demonstrated that the AD group had less complexity at smaller scales in more frontal areas, consistent with previous findings. In contrast, higher complexity at larger scales was observed across brain areas in AD group and this higher complexity was significantly correlated with cognitive decline. Conclusions: MSE measures identified an abnormal complexity profile across different temporal scales and their relation to the severity of AD. Significance: These findings indicate that entropy-based analytic methods with applied at temporal scales may serve as a complementary approach for characterizing and understanding abnormal cortical dynamics in AD. (C) 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据