4.6 Article

High test-retest reliability of checkerboard reversal visual evoked potentials (VEP) over 8 months

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 120, 期 10, 页码 1835-1840

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.014

关键词

Visual evoked potential; GLM; Cross-validation; Sensitivity; Specificity

资金

  1. Unilever Food and Health Research Institute, Vlaardingen, Netherlands
  2. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The inter-individual variation in the shape of a visual evoked potential (VEP) is large even for simple stimuli. We compared the inter-individual variation in VEP waveform to the intra-individual stability. Methods: We recorded VEP with checkerboard stimulation in 10 women aged 19-29 years in two sessions. We determined the latencies and the peak-to-peak amplitude of N75 and P100. As a new approach in VEP research, we regressed VEP waveforms pairwise onto each other and calculated a t-value between all sessions. The maximal t-value was taken to indicate recognition for all 19 comparisons performed with one session. The recognition rate was cross-validated in a generalized linear regression model (GLM). Results: The number of sessions correctly matched to the correct subject was 19 of 20 (true positives) leading to a sensitivity of 95.0% with confidence interval [75.1% 99.9%] for the method. The number of true negatives was 359 of 360 leading to a specificity of 99.7% [98.5% 100.0%]. Conclusions: The VEP waveform shows high intra-individual stability compared to the inter-individual variation in healthy women. Significance: With a new statistical approach the effect of external factors on the VEP waveform can now be contrasted against the normal variability over time in longitudinal studies. (C) 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据