期刊
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 120, 期 10, 页码 1835-1840出版社
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.014
关键词
Visual evoked potential; GLM; Cross-validation; Sensitivity; Specificity
资金
- Unilever Food and Health Research Institute, Vlaardingen, Netherlands
- Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Switzerland
Objective: The inter-individual variation in the shape of a visual evoked potential (VEP) is large even for simple stimuli. We compared the inter-individual variation in VEP waveform to the intra-individual stability. Methods: We recorded VEP with checkerboard stimulation in 10 women aged 19-29 years in two sessions. We determined the latencies and the peak-to-peak amplitude of N75 and P100. As a new approach in VEP research, we regressed VEP waveforms pairwise onto each other and calculated a t-value between all sessions. The maximal t-value was taken to indicate recognition for all 19 comparisons performed with one session. The recognition rate was cross-validated in a generalized linear regression model (GLM). Results: The number of sessions correctly matched to the correct subject was 19 of 20 (true positives) leading to a sensitivity of 95.0% with confidence interval [75.1% 99.9%] for the method. The number of true negatives was 359 of 360 leading to a specificity of 99.7% [98.5% 100.0%]. Conclusions: The VEP waveform shows high intra-individual stability compared to the inter-individual variation in healthy women. Significance: With a new statistical approach the effect of external factors on the VEP waveform can now be contrasted against the normal variability over time in longitudinal studies. (C) 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据