4.6 Article

Classification of schizophrenia with spectro-temporo-spatial MEG patterns in working memory

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 120, 期 6, 页码 1123-1134

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.04.008

关键词

Schizophrenia; Classification; Working memory; MEG; ERD; ERS

资金

  1. Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs
  2. Mind Institute
  3. William and Martha Muska Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate whether temporo-spatial patterns of brain oscillations extracted from multi-channel magnetoencephalogram (MEG) recordings in a working memory task can be used successfully as a biometric marker to discriminate between healthy control subjects and patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Five letters appearing sequentially on a screen had to be memorized. The letters constituted a word in one condition and a pronounceable non-word in the other. Power changes of 248 channel MEG data were extracted in frequency sub-bands and a two-step filter and Search algorithm was used to select informative features that discriminated patients and controls. Results: The discrimination between patients and controls was greater in the word condition than in the non-word condition. Furthermore, in the word condition, the most discriminant patterns were extracted in delta (1-4 Hz), alpha (12-16 Hz) and beta (16-24 Hz) frequency bands. These features were located in the left dorso-frontal, occipital and left fronto-temporal, respectively. Conclusion: The analysis of the oscillatory patterns of MEG recordings in the working memory task provided a high level of correct classification of patients and controls. Significance: We show, using a newly developed algorithm, that the temporo-spatial patterns of brain oscillations can be used as biometric marker that discriminate schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. (C) 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据