4.6 Article

Is it possible to automatically distinguish resting EEG data of normal elderly vs. mild cognitive impairment subjects with high degree of accuracy?

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 119, 期 7, 页码 1534-1545

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.026

关键词

mild cognitive impairment (MCI); Alzheimer's disease (AD); electroencephalography (EEG); artificial neural networks (ANNs)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: It has been shown that a new procedure (implicit function as squashing time, IFAST) based on artificial neural networks (ANNs) is able to compress eyes-closed resting electroencephalographic (EEG) data into spatial invariants of the instant voltage distributions for an automatic classification of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects with classification accuracy of individual subjects higher than 92%. Methods: Here we tested the hypothesis that this is the case also for the classification of individual normal elderly (Nold) vs. MCI subjects, an important issue for the screening of large populations at high risk of AD. E-yes-closed resting EEG data (10-20 electrode montage) were recorded in 171 Nold and in It 5 amnesic MCI subjects. The data inputs for the classification by IFAST were the weights of the connections within a nonlinear auto-associative ANN trained to generate the instant voltage distributions of 60-s artifact-free EEG data. Results: The most relevant features were selected and coincidently the dataset was split into two halves for the final binary classification (training and testing) performed by a supervised ANN. The classification of the individual Nold and MCI subjects reached 95.87% of sensitivity and 91.06% of specificity (93.46% of accuracy). Conclusions: These results indicate that IFAST can reliably distinguish eyes-closed resting EEG in individual Nold and MCI subjects. Significance: IFAST may be used for large-scale periodic screening of large populations at risk of AD and personalized care. (C) 2008 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据