4.6 Article

Impairments of prehension kinematics and grasping forces in patients with cerebellar degeneration and the relationship to cerebellar atrophy

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 119, 期 11, 页码 2528-2537

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.280

关键词

Prehension; Reach-to-grasp; Cerebellar degeneration; MR-volumetry; Ataxia

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [TI 239/8-1, HE 3592/4-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: This study established the relationship between kinematic and grip force parameters in prehension tasks, disease severity and cerebellar atrophy in patients with cerebellar degeneration. Methods: Prehension was tested in a condition during which the hand reached out, grasped, and lifted an object. Task complexity was modified by limiting the transport component to a single-joint movement, and introducing a bimanual condition. Results: Compared to controls the cerebellar patients showed disturbances in hand transport, in hand shaping and the most pronounced in time to peak grip force and the grip/load force coupling. Task-dependent changes did not differ between groups. Ataxia scores revealed significant correlations with hand transport and shaping measures only. Ataxia subscores correlated with volume reduction of appropriate longitudinal cerebellar zones. Volume reduction of the intermediate zone was associated with grip force coordination deficits. Conclusions: Results indicate that the cerebellum may have a more general role in motor control of grasping independent of task complexity. Temporal and coordinative measures of grip force appear to be most useful to assess the severity of grasping deficits in patients with cerebellar degeneration not detectable by clinical ataxia scales. Significance: To assess the severity and course of cerebellar disease grip force control in a standard prehension task is a sensitive quantitative measure. (C) 2008 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据