4.1 Review

Orally Disintegrating Selegiline in Parkinson Patients With Dopamine Agonist-Related Adverse Effects

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 5-10

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e3181b7926f

关键词

Parkinson disease; orally disintegrating selegiline; dopamine agonist adverse effects

资金

  1. Valeant Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether adding orally disintegrating selegiline (ODS) while decreasing dopamine agonist (DA) dosages would reduce DA-related adverse effects (AEs) of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). pedal edema, hallucinations, and impulse control disorders (ICDs) without compromising efficacy in Parkinson disease (PD) patients. Methods: This was a 12-week open-label study of 60 PD patients with motor fluctuations and DA-related AEs of FDS, pedal Edema. hallucinations, and ICDs. Orally disintegrating selegiline was initiated at 1.25 mg once daily, and down titration of the DA was started with a goal of a 50%) reduction by 1 week. At week 6, ODS was increased to 2.5 mg, and further reductions of the DA were allowed if the AEs were not resolved. Results: The addition of ODS allowed a reduction in the mean daily dose of pramipexole from 2.3 to 0.5 mg and immediate-release ropinirole from 11.2 to 2.9 mg. Most subjects reported a reduction or resolution of DA-related AEs 94% with EDS (n = 50), 73% with pedal edema (n = 26), 86% with hallucinations (n = 15), and 94% with ICDs (n = 25). Mean activities of daily living and motor scores front the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale as well as quality-of life scores were significantly improved without an increase in daily off time. The most common AEs, most of which resolved after titration, were worsening of PD, nausea/vomiting, dyskinesia, increased off time, body aches, insomnia, orthostatic hypotension, and increased anxiety and depression. Conclusions: In most subjects, the addition of ODS with decreasing dosages of DAs substantially reduced EDS. pedal edema, hallucinations, and ICDs without compromising efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据