4.0 Article

Microvascularization and expression of VEGF and its receptors in recurring meningiomas: pathobiological data in favor of anti-angiogenic therapy approaches

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPATHOLOGY
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 352-360

出版社

DUSTRI-VERLAG DR KARL FEISTLE
DOI: 10.5414/NP300488

关键词

meningioma; antiangiogenesis; microvessel density; immunohistochemistry; in situ hybridization

资金

  1. Scientific Funds of the Mayor of Vienna [2026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: We studied expression of molecules of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway and its relation to vascularization, cell proliferation and patient outcome in recurring non-anaplastic meningioma. We studied 29 tumor specimens of 8 patients with recurring meningiomas and of 8 age- and gender-matched control patients with non-recurring meningiomas (including meningothelial, transitional, fibroblastic and atypical subtypes) using immunohistochemistry and in-situ hybridization. Results: VEGF protein, VEGF-mRNA, VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-1 mRNA, VEGFR-2 mRNA and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1-alpha protein were expressed in 27/29 (93%), 20/27 (74%), 9/27 (33.3%), 12/27 (44.4%) and 5/29 (17.2%) specimens, respectively. VEGFR-2 mRNA expression was found in 6/8 tumors extracted at first operation in patients with recurring tumors and in none of the control cases (p = 0.007). Microvessel density (MVD) and Ki-67 index values were generally higher in meningiomas with expression of angiogenic factors. The association of high Ki-67 index values with VEGF-mRNA expression was significant (p = 0.04). Time to recurrence was shorter in patients with high MVD than in patients with low MVD (p = 0.027). Conclusions: High MVD correlates with unfavorable prognosis in our series of recurring meningioma. VEGF and its receptors are frequently expressed in meningiomas and seem important for tumor growth and recurrence. Thus, anti-VEGF therapy in aggressive meningioma seems rational from a pathobiological point of view.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据