4.3 Article

Vascular complications of stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
卷 115, 期 6, 页码 713-717

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.08.008

关键词

Arteriovenous malformation; AVM; Hemorrhage; SRS; Radiosurgery; Linear accelerator; Aneurysm; Vasculopathy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Although vasculopathy and de novo aneurysm formation are known complications of traditional radiation therapy, their occurrence following AVM SRS is rare and thus infrequently addressed in the literature. We sought to evaluate these phenomena-through a review of our institutional experience. Methods: Our review afforded 32 patients treated with LINAC-based SRS over an eight year period. We noted obliteration rates, complication rates and long-term outcomes, with particular attention paid to follow-up angiographic studies. Results: After a mean follow-up of 4.3 years, the overall obliteration rate was 50%, increasing to 87% for AVMs less than 3 cm. Eight patients had nine hemorrhages following SRS (25%). One occurred in the context of a de nova arterial pseudoaneurysm and another in the context of a new venous varix. Two patients with post-SRS hemorrhage had intranidal aneurysms that were not as apparent on initial angiography. Two patients that did not suffer from latency period hemorrhage developed dysplastic changes of feeding arteries, and one patient suffered from early venous thrombosis with resultant permanent hemiparesis from infarction. After a mean follow-up of 4.3 years, 8 patients were clinically improved (25%), 19 were the same (59%), and 5 were worse (16%), including 2 that died as a result of latency period hemorrhage. Conclusion: While radiosurgery of AVMs is safe and successful in the vast majority of cases, vasculopathic complications including de novo aneurysm and varix development, early venous occlusion and stenotic vasculopathy, while infrequent, can occur. Closer long-term angiographic surveillance of these patients may thus be warranted. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据