4.3 Article

Blood flow velocity in the arteries of the anterior cerebral artery complex in patients with an azygos anterior cerebral artery aneurysm: A transcranial color-coded sonography study

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
卷 111, 期 1, 页码 63-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.08.007

关键词

Azygos anterior cerebral artery aneurysm; Blood flow velocity; Transcranial color-coded sonography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: It is presumed that increased blood flow through the single azygos anterior cerebral artery (Az) may contribute to the formation of an Az aneurysm. The aim of this study was to assess the blood flow velocities in the arteries of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) complex in patients with the Az aneurysm. Patients and methods: A series of three patients (2 men, aged: 65, 52 and 41) with an aneurysm (unruptured in two cases) of the distal Az was examined. Blood flow velocities in the Az and the Al segment of the ACA were measured by means of a transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCS) and the Az to Al segment (Az/Al) velocity ratio was calculated. The control group consisted of 22 healthy subjects (mean age: 44 years). Results: There was a trend toward decreased (p = 0.06) mean blood flow velocity in the Az compared to the A2 segment of the ACA of the control group. Blood velocity in the Al segment did not differ between the study and control groups. Pulsatility and resistance indices in the Az were similar to those in the A2 segment of the control group. There were no differences between the Az/Al ratio in the study group and the A2/Al velocity ratio in the control group. Conclusion: Our results suggest that Az aneurysms are not associated with increased blood flow velocity in the Az. Possibly, a hemodynamic stress related to the Az bifurcation geometry, together with a bent course of this artery around the genu of the corpus callosum, predispose to aneurysm formation. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据