4.7 Article

Multi-objective optimization of parallel machine scheduling integrated with multi-resources preventive maintenance planning

期刊

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 182-192

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.07.002

关键词

Multi-objective optimization; Production scheduling; Preventive maintenance; NSGA-II; Multi-resource maintenance

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [71101106, 71171149, 71428002]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many studies on the integration optimization of production scheduling and preventive maintenance usually only consider one resource, i.e., machine. However, in real-world manufacturing, multiple dependent resources (e.g., human, tools and machines) are needed at the same time to avoid mismatch of multi-resource usage, which makes it highly important to jointly schedule production and maintenance tasks of multiple resources in order to improve system availability and system throughput simultaneously. In this paper, a multi-objective parallel machine scheduling problem with two kinds of resources (machines and moulds) and with flexible preventive maintenance activities on resources are investigated. The objective is to simultaneously minimize the makespan for the production aspect, the unavailability of the machine system, and the unavailability of the mould system for the maintenance aspect. A multi-objective integrated optimization method with NSGA-II adaption is proposed to solve this problem. The extensive computational experiments are conducted. The results show that the integrated optimization method of production scheduling and preventive maintenance outperforms the method with periodic preventive maintenance for this problem, in terms of multi-objective metrics, and the results also show the effects of different flexibilities of resources for job processing. (C) 2015 The Society of Manufacturing Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据