4.7 Article

Non-antibiotic treatment for bacterial infections: how to validate chance findings

期刊

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 298-301

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02754.x

关键词

ACE inhibitors; observational studies; pneumonia; review; sepsis; statins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have examined in observational studies a possible influence of statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers and beta-blockers on the prevention of infections or on their outcomes. A priori, we can suspect that biases will work in favour of chance findings, because of the motivation to publish, to publish piquant findings, and to find new niches for lucrative drugs. We should distinguish between three phases. Publication of a novel finding should raise the possibility that an intervention will work in situations other than those expected, and justify, as a second phase, the performance of rigorous, prospective, observational studies. If the results of these studies substantiate the claims for benefit, randomized controlled trials may be performed in the third phase. For all the questions examined here, we have not yet passed the threshold of evidence needed to offer patients participation in randomized controlled trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据