4.7 Article

Dissemination of multidrug-resistant, class 1 integron-carrying Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in Taiwan

期刊

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 1010-1019

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02077.x

关键词

Acinetobacter baumannii; epidemic clone; integron-associated; multidrug-resistant; ribotype

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC95-2314-B-010-061-MY2]
  2. National Health Research Institutes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, 283 multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB) bloodstream isolates were collected between 1996 and 2004, from three teaching hospitals located in different regions of Taiwan. Susceptibility data showed that strains carrying class 1 integrons were significantly more resistant (p < 0.01) to all tested antibiotics (except aztreonam and chloramphenicol) than strains lacking integrons, Seven types of gene cassette were identified among these strains, including two that have not been previously reported. The vast majority of the cassettes encoded aminoglycoside resistance genes, including aacA4, aacC1, aac(6')-II, aadA1, aadA2, aadA4 and aadDA1. Sixteen distinct ribotypes were identified in MDR-AB isolates carrying class 1 integrons. Only one strain was found to produce an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, i.e. VEB-3. In the 18 imipenem-resistant strains, two carbapenenmase genes, bla(VIM-11) and bla(OXA-58), were found concomitantly in one isolate. An island-wide epidemic clone and an endemic clone from a hospital located in the northern region were identified by ribotyping. On the basis of the susceptibility data among the different ribogroups, the epidemic clone was associated more significantly with resistance to cefepime and ampicillin-sulbactam than was the endemic clone. In conclusion, the presence of class 1 integrons was significantly associated with resistance in MDR-AB, and the epidemic, class 1 integron-carrying MDR-AB clone was found to be widespread in Taiwan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据