4.2 Article

Purposeful wanderings: mate search strategies of male white-tailed deer

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
卷 96, 期 2, 页码 279-286

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyv004

关键词

breeding season; GPS radiocollar; mate search strategy; movement; Odocoileus virginianus; periodicity; rut; white-tailed deer

类别

资金

  1. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
  2. Quality Deer Management Association
  3. Samuel Noble Roberts Foundation
  4. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
  5. King Ranch Inc.
  6. CKWRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In species where defense of females or resources attractive to females is not an option, males search for mates. How males locate mates is not well understood. Male white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) are assumed to search widely for females in estrus; but the rut (2-4 weeks) and estrus (1-2 days) are short and males would benefit by having a strategy to locate mates. Because females typically have small home-range sizes and exhibit site fidelity, we predicted males would spend time in small focal areas containing females during rut. We fitted 102 males with GPS collars across 5 breeding seasons in South Texas. During rut, movement rates increased but most males used a small portion (26-34%) of their home ranges. Most males had 2 small focal areas (18-33 ha) which were revisited every 20-28 h. Because estrus is similar to 24 h, males may revisit focal areas to assess female receptiveness. During peak rut, 1 year olds had the lowest movement rates and rates were similar in 2- and >= 3-year-old males. However, most 2 year-old males exhibited Levy walks, an efficient search strategy when resources are rare. One-year- old males may not have exerted high effort, whereas most 2 year olds used a different strategy because of competition or lack of experience. Our results provide the first fine-scale description of ungulate mate-searching behavior and how spatial memory may be important for acquiring mating opportunities in species that rove for mates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据