4.4 Article

Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy Plus Concomitant Temozolomide for the Treatment of Brain Metastases From Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Study

期刊

CLINICAL LUNG CANCER
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 176-181

出版社

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.3816/CLC.2010.n.022

关键词

Brain metastasis; Central nervous system progression; TMZ

类别

资金

  1. Schering-Plough Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A previously published study of temozolomide concurrent with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) reported significant improvement in response rates and a nonsignificant trend toward improved overall survival compared with WBRT alone in patients with brain metastases primarily from lung cancer. This study sought to confirm the benefit of adding temozolomide to WBRT in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases. Patients and Methods: This planned phase III study (target = 380 events) was converted to a phase II study (target = 70 events) because of poor enrollment. Patients with NSCLC and >= 1 newly diagnosed brain lesion were randomized to WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions) alone or combined with temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)/day) for 21 or 28 days. Endpoints included overall survival and time to central nervous system (CNS) progression. Results: Median overall survival and median time to CNS progression was 4.4 and 3.1 months in the WBRT + temozolomide arm (n = 47) versus 5.7 and 3.8 months in the WBRT arm (n = 48). However, there were imbalances in the percentages of patients receiving previous chemotherapy and with synchronous brain metastases. Adding temozolomide to WBRT increased the frequency of nausea, vomiting, alopecia, fatigue, anorexia, and constipation. Most adverse events were mild to moderate. Conclusion: The benefit of adding temozolomide to WBRT was not confirmed; however, the accrual goal for the planned phase III trial was not reached, and the study regimen differed from regimens used previously. Therefore, the role of temozolomide in treating brain metastases remains unresolved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据