4.6 Article

Decreases in PTH in Japanese Hemodialysis Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: Associations with Changing Practice Patterns

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.11501210

关键词

-

资金

  1. Kyowa Hakko Kirin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objectives Control of serum concentrations of calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) is essential for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). Design, setting, participants, & measurements This is a planned interim analysis of a longitudinal cohort study. The settings are dialysis facilities in Japan. Eligible patients comprise all those who were receiving hemodialysis at one of 86 participating facilities and who have SHPT. Using data from a random sample (n = 3276) of the participants from January 2008 through June 2009, we measured changes in the percentages of patients who were within the national guideline specified target ranges of Ca (8.4 to 10 mg/di), P (3.5 to 6.0 mg/dl), and intact PTH (iPTH) (60 to 180 pg/ml), and changes in prescriptions of drugs targeting SHPT. We used regression models to identify factors affecting the achievement of the guideline-specified targets. Results There were no notable changes in the percentage of patients who were within the guideline for Ca, P, or both. The percentage who were within the iPTH guideline increased from 14.5% to 43.3% (P < 0.001). There were no remarkable changes in the percentage of patients receiving vitamin D or phosphate binders. The percentage who received cinacalcet increased from 0% to 29%. Prescription of cinacalcet was associated with improvement or target-achievement for iPTH and for Ca by 16.8 percentage points (95% CI: 8.1 to 17.0) and by 12.6 percentage points (13.7 to 19.9), respectively. Conclusions In the routine care of hemodialysis patients, increasing use of cinacalcet was associated with better control of SHPT. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6: 2280-2288, 2011. doi:10.2215/CJN.11501210

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据